Shouldn't we stop voting only for one prep?

Seed compensation is attractive.
Everyone will vote for sesameseed and I think this is a problem.
I think there should be a voting limit.

For example, if one person only allows up to 70% of their vote.
Shouldn’t you do something?

We are considering a cap on delegation for ICON 2.0 as suggested by a few other community members when discussing Vote Decay/Stagnancy

There is too much time left until Icon 2.0. Setting a limit will only increase people’s wallet accounts, and I don’t think it will be a big control. Above all, I am curious if the other p-reps have accepted the voting purchase.

I think you misunderstood, sorry I should have been more clear. It would be a cap on the delegation received by a P-Rep

1 Like

Oh very good thinking

1 Like

For getting the reward the problem is that we have to vote for sesameseed to get seed proportionate to one’s own vote.
If the votes for sesameseed are full and I can’t vote, will only those who voted quickly get seeded? I am curious about this situation