Nobody likes to see the angry scorned investors, I don’t like seeing it. Doesn’t make me happy. Like I said, the only way to stop this is to give control of the network back to ICON, where only white-listed people could register a p-rep. If the majority of the community wants to do this, I don’t think ICON would necessarily have a problem with it. The next step for this would be a text proposal vote to give ICON back control of the network and the authority to whitelist specific p-reps. If you have some other idea I’m open to it, but I believe this would be the only option to actually stop a large stakeholder from operating a node.
As for the 95% uptime has been solved at a protocol level in ICON 2.0. I already said that we can solve this manually on ICON 1.0 by DQing dead nodes if that is what the community wants. The next step here would be a text proposal discussing the specific objective circumstances about when to DQ an inactive node. From there, if it passes, I would suggest some sort of social media blast and attempt to spread awareness on the change.
@Cali @Brandon_FBM The ball is in your court. If you want to see a specific change, put together the proposal and write it in the Network Proposal section. Then it can go to an on-chain vote.